'A'a vs. Pahoehoe:
All lava flows pass through a range of viscosities as they
cool and solidify. Therefore you can't say that forms when the
viscosity is low and forms when the viscosity is high. If that
were the case you would never find any solidified pahoehoe because
it has to go through high viscosities on its way to solidifying.
The important factor is whether or not the lava is still moving
at the time that it has developed the high viscosity (Peterson & Tilling 1980).
This helps to explain why a pahoehoe flow sometimes becomes when
it flows down a steep slope: If it has cooled to the point that
it can no longer deform fluidly, it will instead break or be pulled
apart into spiny clinkers. A sustained volumetric flow rate above
~10 cubic meters per second will cause almost any Hawaiian lava
to form 'a'a so that if you find an 'a'a flow you can be pretty
sure that it was emplaced at a high volumetric flow rate. A pahoehoe
flow, on the other hand, tells you that the eruption took place
at a low volumetric flow rate. Volumetric flow rates can in turn
usually be associated with discharge rates at the vent, and thus
these two flow types can provide a great deal of information about
eruptive conditions even if nobody was around to record the eruption.
For example, long-duration tube-fed pahoehoe eruptions require
a mechanically open pathway for magma to travel from the magma
chamber. This is because the flow rate through the underground
conduits is so low that magma pressure alone is unable to hold
open the conduit. Such a mechanically strong conduit can last
for long periods of time (years). During these eruptions, summit
tilt (which is an indirect indication of magma chamber inflation
or deflation) often shows no consistent inflation or deflation.
The suggestion is that an open pathway has been established from
the magma source (the mantle?) all the way to the vent.
A high-discharge rate eruption, on the other hand, (which
produces 'a'a) does have sufficient pressure to erupt where no
mechanically strong conduit exists, but only while the magma pressure
remains high (Wilson & Head 1988;
Hoffmann et al. 1990).
This is the reason why high-discharge rate eruptions tend to be
short-lived (often hours to days), and are associated with distinct
summit deflation events (indicating emptying of the magma chamber,
or at least a part of it). One relationship that is commonly found
is for one or more short-duration high-discharge rate eruptions
to precede a long-duration low discharge-rate eruption. Long-lasting
low discharge rate eruptions will occur only if the repeated pumping
of magma through the conduits during the earlier eruptions are
able to establish an open pathway. Otherwise the eruption ends
when the high discharge-rate portion ends (the conduits close
off). Thus mapping the distributions of lava flow types can provide
information about the nature of volcanic plumbing systems.
Mantle supply rates:
Because the discharge rates of almost all tube-fed pahoehoe
eruptions on both and Mauna Loa seem to have been between 2 and
5 cubic meters per second, this has been proposed to be the supply
rate to each volcano from the mantle (Swanson 1972;
Dzurisin et al. 1984;
Rowland & Walker 1990).
You may recall from the beginning of this review that dividing
the total volume of Mauna Loa by its estimated age yields essentially
the same value. This would imply that all magma supplied from
the mantle is erupted onto the surface; this is definitely not
the case. When the volume of lava erupted onto the surface at
Mauna Loa since the arrival of westerners (1778) is divided by
the time since 1778, the rate is only 1 cubic meter per second,
and a similar calculation for Kilauea yields a value of only 0.2
cubic meter/sec.
These values are 3 and 15 times smaller than the proposed
supply rate of about 3 meters per second. These relationships
point out the pitfalls of looking only at the surfaces of volcanoes
for short periods of their lives, and suggest that the ratio of
intruded:erupted magma is high at both Mauna Loa and Kilauea.